Monday, August 01, 2011

Natanyahu’s Magic Hat…

From Wish you Orwell (lightly edited for spelling)

Don’t die a fool

Netanyahu’s magic hat is emptying quickly. Unlike his last term, he failed in buying the students for a few slices of pizza, and his attempt to pre-empt the “stroller protest” by parents, planned for today, was particularly pathetic: He offered to lower the bus fare of a parent with a stroller by 50%. The offer was received with appropriate derision. The fact that the leader of the trade unions, lackluster Ofer Eynee, joined the protest belatedly, and the jump-on-band-wagon manoeuvre by Tzippi Livni – she was seen marching with the striking doctors today, after a silence longer than that of Ehud Barak – must have made Netanyahu sweat even more.

I’m hearing from several quarters that Netanyahu has only two rabbits left in his hat. One of them is the release of captive soldier Gilad Shalit, who has become a sort of celebrity in Israel. It’s not at all clear this will end the protests, and the manoeuvre becomes complicated because it requires the agreement of Hamas, which, for its own part, is in no rush. After all, a new government – needing a quick boost of popularity – may well pay for Shalit. This particular rabbit, then, ought to be considered a Schrödinger: Netanyahu won’t know if it’s dead or alive until he pulls it out of the hat. Not good. He cannot afford a backfire. Not now.

The other rabbit is going to a splendid little war. Or, if not a full-fledged war, a massive operation which looks just like the real thing. This schtick rarely fails. Israeli air force planes circled over Gaza last night, and in general the IDF seems to be heating the Gaza sector in the last few weeks. And if we’ve already mentioned Ehud Barak, then it’s worth noting he flew again to the US last night, for another meeting with the American leadership. What for?

I don’t know. I do know, however, that security officials in the north have received an official warning from the government that September is going to be hot. Possibly a war, possibly against the Palestinians, possibly against the Israeli Palestinians, possibly against Hizbullah.

It is worth noting that, contrary to myth, most of Israel’s wars were propagated by it, often for a political reason. The 1956 war was a conspiracy of Shimon Peres with two declining colonial powers, France and Britain. Prior to the 1967 war, the Americans asked for time for diplomacy, but the IDF was impatient to the point of a threatened putsch, and war broke out. The attack on the Iraqi nuclear reactor took place several days before a general election, which was not a coincidence. The Lebanon War of 1982 needs no explanation. Shimon Peres went to Operation Grapes of Wrath in 1996, in order to win the coming elections; Being Shimon Peres, he managed to lose them by 0.4%, by shelling Qafr Qana and thereby convincing his Arab voters to stay home and not go the polls. In 2006, the IDF used a border incident – granted, a clear casus belli – in order to start a war intent to wipe the shame of defeat by Hizbullah in 2000. Needless to say, this did not work as planned. Cast Lead was the result of an Israeli wish for conflict, and rejection of Hamas’ attempt at prolonging the ceasefire. One needs a healthy dose of goodwill and bulk quantities of naiveté in order to believe it had nothing to do with the already-declared elections.

Ehud Barak has no political future worth speaking of, and he’s intelligent enough to know that, and know that he is the most hated politician in the history of the republic – so hated, nothing short of seppuku will improve his image. Even that might not do the trick, though it’s certain many people will show up for the funeral, just to make certain he’s really defunct. One wonders whether he’s in the US in order to garner support for a war, which is the only thing which will buy him more time in power. With the exception of 1956 – Eisenhower was livid by the invasion of Egypt, as the US was not consulted, and had the Hungarian crisis on its hands – every other Israeli war has received American support, even if tentative; and Israel did not go to war again without reaching an understanding with the US.

So, should a war suddenly breaks out in the next few weeks; if the northern border, or perhaps the southern, suddenly erupts, as it by its own volition; if Netanyahu makes a surprise TV appearance, pale and resolute, and inform us he ordered the IDF to start bombing Iran, to prevent it from becoming Nazi Germany – should any of this happen, don’t believe a single word you’re told. Assume that the regime is trying to save itself by a war. After all, that’s what our propaganda has been saying of the Arab rulers for years. Do you think Barak is less cynical that Nasrallah? That Netanyahu cares a fig about the citizens more than Nasser did?

One hopes that the very public warning by Meir Dagan – remember him? – and his doubts whether the current security leadership can stand up to an adventurous government will shame the military brass into blocking this grotesque idea. But army life is not conductive to common sense and to the ability to say “no” to your superiors. So, if war suddenly breaks out, our duty will be to disrupt it: Storm the Kirya (military headquarters), block entrance to Air Force bases, and basically refuse to play the part of pawns in Barak and Netanyahu’s attempt to the save the ruling economical-political oligarchy by paying in citizen’s blood. The true patriot, in such a case, will have to face down his government and army.

Let’s hope this does not happen, but let us be ready for it.

9 Comments:

At 6:01 PM, Blogger Daniel Hoffmann-Gill said...

I see Ren's has closed, I wonder where all the trolls will go to vomit?

Hope you're well mate.

 
At 6:05 PM, Blogger Gert said...

Ren will start another blog. And they'll find him, no doubt about it in my mind.

 
At 7:05 PM, Blogger Daniel Hoffmann-Gill said...

While he allows an unaccountable forum for their backward views, he will be dogged by them incessently.

A problem entirely of his own making and one that makes any blog he decides to run somewhere I'll never go.

 
At 9:13 AM, Blogger Daniel Marks said...

Though as usual, the cutting and the pasting were nothing short of exquisite, your choice of article left something to be desired. The article is based on the erroneous assumption that Netanyahu needs to do something to recover his popularity and will try to either free Gilad Shalit or start a war.

It is true that a large majority of the Israeli public support the demands of the protestors, demands that they themselves have yet to agree upon. However, strangely, not only has Netanyahu's Likud party not fallen in the polls, but Kadima has, while Likud's most loyal allies have also held their own or even gone up. This is a Ha'aretz poll, the paper that despises Netanya more than any other:

http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/1236065.html

I could hazard a few guesses as to why the Likud is not plunging, but they would be just (extremely intelligent) speculation.

Either way, in a position in which the Right block would easily win another election held today, why should Netanyahu start an unnecessary war? That is why he will not do so in my humble opinion. The economy is booming and with it property prices are going up, it's a pity, but those are the realities of economics. It would be nice to have almost full employment, a high Shekel exchange rate and falling house prices, but not only is this hard to imagine, it's unlikely to be a reason why
Netanyahu loses the next election. He may lose, I wouldn't cry if he did, but it won't be because of spoilt kids from Tel Aviv who think that a cheap apartment is a basic human right.

 
At 8:33 PM, Blogger Gert said...

Daniel:

"He may lose, I wouldn't cry if he did, but it won't be because of spoilt kids from Tel Aviv who think that a cheap apartment is a basic human right."

Spoken like a true Conservative!

 
At 8:47 PM, Blogger Daniel Marks said...

Actually,as a kid,I went with Kopaloff to look into joining the Young Conservatives in Mill Hill. This was after having been accepted as a bell-ringer at the local church and before a brief flirtation with Communism. The only thing I remember now was being told was that drinking was involved, and the recruiter laughed at his own jokes.

Anyway, am I supposed to be offended? For once you may be right about something. I'm pretty sure that had I remained in Britain I would have, voted Tory...certainly by the age of 50.

 
At 12:03 PM, Blogger Gert said...

Offense is in the eye of the beholder...

Anyway, if they start protesting because the price of bread is too high, tell'em to eat cake!

 
At 9:37 PM, Blogger Daniel Marks said...

I think in this case the more correct analogy would be them all demanding the most expensive cream cakes and trying to explain to them that there just aren't enough for everybody.

Hey,is this a record number of comments?

 
At 8:12 PM, Blogger Gert said...

I've never understood why some 'have nots' feel the need to put their faith in Conservatism.

Alan Sugar, I can see it. Dragon Den's dragons? Sure. Born with a silver spoon in your mouth? Of course.

But ordinary people? Nope.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home