Syria's nuclear reactor: it's almost official
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ec1c/7ec1c6682a869f296c199c92cb557bb648d638fc" alt="Al_Kibar"
There remain nonetheless multiple questions. The Al Kibar facility shows no upstream or downstream facilities. Upstream a nuclear fuel processing plant would be needed to produce the natural uranium (as metal or oxide) from ore, at sufficiently high purity ('atomic grade') and in the right physical form.
Downstream, a spent-fuel processing plant, most likely deploying the PUREX process for the separation of nuclear fission products, Plutonium 239 and unconverted Uranium would be needed. A Plutonium refinery plant, capable of processing the separated and highly dangerous material from a chemically bound form to metallic Plutonium and subsequent machining of the metal into bomb cores would also be needed.
The absence of such facilities puts into question certain claims that the facility was within weeks of becoming operational.
Finally there remains the question of Uranium sourcing. As far as we know Syria has no internal sources (mines) of this highly restricted material. Iran does have its own mines but shipping ore or processed Uranium to Syria would be a high risk strategy. There is also some speculation about Syrian efforts to extract Uranium from phosphate rocks, a fairly common practice to produce fertiliser.
Further reading: ISIS report on Al Kibar (*.pdf)
2 Comments:
Really interesting post.
The fact Syria never brought up the bombing at the UN, or any in front of any body, made it look like they had something to hide.
Yes, it all fits rather neatly into place...
Post a Comment
<< Home