Saturday, January 14, 2006

Impeach Blair?

In previous posts I've elaborated on my viewpoint that the reasons for Britain to follow the US into war in Iraq were all wrong. I saw it that way before the invasion and with the power of hindsight my misgivings about WMD, the 45 minute threat, Saddam's involvement in 9/11 and his role in "Global Terrorism" have been strongly vindicated.

In the light of this and with logical consistency I've called the prime architect of this debacle, PM Tony Blair, a liar and a war criminal and have called for his resignation and even impeachment.

Bizarrely and unexpectedly, calls for the impeachment of the PM have now come from the most unlikely of quarters imaginable: that most revered of establishments; the British Army.
The ex-UN commander in Bosnia General Sir Michael Rose said Mr Blair had to take responsibility for his actions. I'm not really going to comment on Sir Michael's statements as they speak for themselves and instead want concentrate on other aspects of calls for holding Mr Blair to account.

Calls for the impeachment of both Blair and Bush aren't new of course and Sir Michael doesn't stand exactly alone in his cause.

But would impeaching Blair actually achieve anything? Well, if somehow we expect Blair to be convicted and sentenced, then I'm convinced we are deluding ourselves: technically I don't think we stand a chance of achieving that goal. Whilst Blair has lied, told half-truths, cherry-picked "intel" and presented information in such a way that the general public could only misconstrue it, all this manipulation was carried out skilfully, and in such a way that would make a making a legal case that would not only stand up in court but also yield a reasonable chance of conviction rather difficult.

Others point to the danger of criminalising the political process, US style, and I find that a fair point.

Nonetheless, there is a point of principle to be observed here. In a country that is frankly obsessed with accountability and will make its citizens pay for even the smallest of misdemeanours, leaders who commit some of the greatest blunders in the last fifty years of British Foreign policy should not be allowed to walk away scot-free.

In a country obsessed with safety and National Security, leaders which put the country in great peril to implement policies that have been justified only on the back of a pack of lies, should be held accountable.

So, yes, please, let's see if we can let the PM have his day in court. He too can then defend his actions and we might actually learn something about Blair's real motives for supporting the catastrophe that Iraq has turned out to be...

We must however remain aware that impeachment is a political gamble: if the case is lost, the Blairites and New Labour will feel their past actions have been justified by the legal ruling. Imagine the damage it would do to our cause. Both Labour and the Tories would probably feel they had carte blanche for just about anything...


Hat tip to This Old Brit.

Keywords:
, , ,

4 Comments:

At 11:45 PM, Blogger Richard said...

*But would impeaching Blair actually achieve anything? Well, if somehow we expect Blair to be convicted and sentenced, then I'm convinced we are deluding ourselves ...

Of course you're right, Gert. But even if all we can ever realistically achieve is exposing him far & wide for the utter phony he is, I still think that's a worthwhile endeavour.

Incidentally, many thanks for your cite and link.

Aaaaaannnd -- have you seen this? Bill Clinton's talking about his bossom buddie Blair, replacing Annan [who retires at the end of this year] as the head of the UN.
Clinton backs Blair as UN chief

 
At 11:11 AM, Blogger Gert said...

Oh God, does this coterie of worldwide "leaders" have no limits at all?

 
At 6:18 PM, Blogger J.UL1R4 said...

Hey Gert how you doing ?

From where I am sitting there is a massive constitutional crisis in the UK thanks to Blair, not to mention a wider crisis in the world thanks to his 'grand chessboard' pretentions of being part of this hideous re-engineering of the globe.

Back home, his strategy has been to keep going with the denial, depite the fact that we know something has gone very very badly wrong.

You can feel the horror, the anger, the breakdown of the reality in the air in the UK, it is that bad.

Yet a few establishment whitewashes later Blair is looking even more warped, more dangerous, more fanatical than ever.

It is not an option for Blair to go (on) unscathed. It is something the world will continue to pay for for a very long time to come if nothing happens.

Blair as UN chief ? Exactly as Gert says, no limits at all, the threat is immeasurable.

 
At 12:54 PM, Blogger Gert said...

I don't mean to sound pessimistic but we can't even get our hands on the al-Jazeera memo to publish it, how on earth are we going to be able to initiate a process of impeachment, a process that is largely dead here in the UK.

There is also a tremendous downside to impeachment: if the case was to be lost (that's entirely possible) the defendant will feel doubly vindicated and in that case the consequences in terms of future behaviour of the political parties could indeed be dire for us. Careful what you wish for...

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home